Winner of the 2008 PROSE Award for Best Book in Sociology or Social Work
Princeton University Press. 2008.
Cop in the Hood is an explosive insider’s story of what it is really like to be a police officer on the front lines of the war on drugs. Harvard-trained sociologist Peter Moskos became a cop in Baltimore’s roughest neighborhood.... Moskos reveals the truth about the drug war and why it is engineered to fail.... He describes police-academy graduates fully unprepared for the realities of the street. He tells of a criminal-justice system that incarcerates poor black men on a mass scale—a self-defeating system that measures success by arrest quotas and fosters a street code at odds with the rest of society—and argues for drug legalization as the only realistic way to end drug violence and let cops once again protect and serve.... Cop in the Hood ventures deep behind the Thin Blue Line to disclose the inner workings of law enforcement in America’s inner cities. Those who read it will never view the badge the same way.
Publications:
Professor Peter C. Moskos
John Jay College of Criminal Justice
Department of Law and Police Science
CUNY Graduate Center, Dept of Sociology
Cop in the Hood. WYPR (Baltimore Public Radio) “Midday with Don Rodricks.” August 11, 2008 (50 min).
Cop in the Hood. WBAL “Ron Smith Show.” August 11, 2008 (26 min).
Cop in the Hood. WNYC (New York Public Rado) Leonard Lopate Show. July 22, 2008 (32 min).
Cop in the Hood. WBAL's Ron Smith Show.
June 17, 2008 (20 min).
Cop in the Hood. WBAL's Ron Smith Show.
May 13, 2008 (25 min).
Cop in the Hood. National Public Radio's "On Point" with Tom Ashbrook.
April 30, 2008 (56 min).
Sean Bell Verdict May Deepen Mistrust of Police. National Public Radio's "Talk of the Nation."
April 29, 2008 (45 min).
Cop in the Hood.Bloggingheads.tv online interview.
April 14, 2008 (1 hour).
Examining the Causes of Witness Intimidation. "Talk of the Nation" with Neal Conan, National Public Radio
May 1, 2006 (30 min).
Stop Snitching? WNYC's "Brian Lehrer Show" Hosted by Beth Fertig February 24, 2006 (25 min).
The Case for Drug Legalization.
WRMN's “Freedom Rings”
October 31, 2005 (1 hour).
Journal Articles
Policing: A Sociologist’s Response to an Anthropological Account.
PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review. Vol. 33 (S1), May 2010.
The more jargon and sociobabble we anthropologists, sociologists, and ethnographers spew out--the more we strive to define ourselves as literate scribes in an academic temple--the more irrelevant we become.
...
Aping quantitative science is not the answer. Imagine if all poetry had to conform to the structure of a haiku. ... [Who] would remember "Casey at the Bat" if it were written like this: mighty casey swings – oh two two on down by two – no joy in Mudville.
...
I just wish more academics would worry about the Elements of Style as much as they obsess over the whims of anonymous reviewers and straitjacket themselves with journal orthodoxy.
The Better Part of Valor:
Court-Overtime Pay as the Main Determinant for Discretionary Police Arrests
Law Enforcement Executive Forum. Vol. 8(3). May 2008.
Discretionary arrests are more influenced by officer-based variables than any suspect-based variable. The discretionary will—even whim—of individual police officers, the desire to make an arrest, is the best predictor of arrest numbers. Desire for court overtime pay is the single more important factor affecting the quantity of discretionary arrests. Age and morale are also significant causal variables.
911 and the Failure of
Police Rapid Response
Law Enforcement Executive Forum. 2007. vol. 7(4)
No police officer is ever promoted to beat cop. Foot patrol is most often a form of punishment. While the public generally favors increased foot patrol, the opposition
to foot patrol in the police organization is strong. Recognizing the failures and limitations of the status quo is the first step to
better patrol: 911 calls dominate police far more than rapid response impacts
crime.
Afro-Anglo: America’s Core Culture: A Consolidation of Peoples in the
United States.
National Journal of Sociology. 1995. vol. 9(2)
There exists a Core Culture in American which is shared by all people inasmuch as they are American. This Core Culture is a consolidation of Anglo-American and Afro-American culture. While many authors view the black experience as distinct and separate from the core American experience, this paper argues that American Core Culture is uniquely defined by its Afro-Anglo nature—a blend of both the Afro and the Anglo culture, history, and experience. That Afro-Anglo culture has not been recognized as America’s Core Culture is due both the Eurocentrism of the dominant paradigm of American culture, and the Afrocentrist competing paradigm of a separate black American culture. Afro-Anglo Core Culture recognized the oneness of whites and blacks together as part of the American experience.
Two Shades of Blue:Black and White in the Blue Brotherhood
Law Enforcement Executive Forum. Vol. 8(5). September 2008.
Black and white police officers have different attitudes towards the role of police in society, police department politics, and the minority community. A common ground of police identity is found in conservative social beliefs and opposition to “ghetto” culture. But attitudinal similarities do not negate differences between the races. Black and white police do not blend into the same shade of blue.
I was the first critic of "don't ask, don't tell." It was 1993, and I was home on break from college. My father, Charles Moskos, and I were watching TV and drinking ouzo.
My father ... came up with the concept and coined the phrase ["don't ask don't tell"]. He had lots of crazy ideas. But this one, I declared, was "the stupidest idea you've ever come up with."
A few months later ... "don't ask, don't tell" was the law of the land.
Today ... I am convinced that my father would support the repeal of "don't ask, don't tell."
The pattern today is when police start driving, they never "walk foot" again. That represents a loss for community and police alike. Foot patrol officers knew their neighborhood because in a real sense they were part of it. Beat cops watched people grow up, get jobs, or get in trouble.
...
Just as overtime pay drives discretionary arrests, extra pocket money would change the very culture of patrol. Officers need to want to walk foot, and more money is a way to make them want it. Only with willing officers does foot patrol bring the best possible benefits.
It's not as crazy as it sounds. Legalization does not mean giving up. It means regulation and control. By contrast, criminalization means prohibition. But we can't regulate what we prohibit, and drugs are too dangerous to remain unregulated.
Only after years of witnessing the ineffectiveness of drug policies ... have we and other police officers begun to question the system.
Drug manufacturing and distribution is too dangerous to remain in the hands of unregulated criminals. Drug distribution needs to be the combined responsbility of doctors, the government, and a legal and regulated free market. This simple step would quickly emiminate the greatest threat of violence: street-corner drug dealing.
Simply knowing the race of stopped drivers is virtually
meaningless; the data will neither placate critics nor reflect
well on what is generally a good police department.
The police officer in me is suspicious of any effort to
quantify a job that is — or at least should be — qualitative.
But the professor in me loves police data on race.
When I was a police officer in Baltimore, I was very
suspicious of whites driving slowly around drug corners in
the neighborhood at 3 a.m. Some might say I profiled white
people. I call it good policing.
Race is a factor in America and a factor in effective
policing. Racism should never be.
The only way to prevent creeping use of implied consent is to
limit the doctrine of plain view. Before searching a person,
the government must choose either plain view or implied
consent.
If the government must search without probable cause, let it
search, but only for illegal weapons or bombs. If security
outweighs the Fourth Amendment, the scope of such
searches must be limited to objects representing a clear and
present danger to public safety. Any unrelated suspicious or
illegal objects found must be ignored.
Victims of the War on Drugs
The Washington Post, July 09, 2003
If the war on drugs were winnable, we would already have
won it. Drug prohibition criminalizes large segments of the
population, even the majority in some areas.
Those at the receiving end of our drug policy know it simply
doesn’t work. People will riot as long as police keep locking
them up without anything getting better.
Separate the problems of drug use from the violence of the
drug trade. Acknowledge that drugs are bad, but don’t
frame drug policy as a moral war against evil.
Every police/public confrontation ends up in one of three ways: the suspect 1) leaves the scene, 2) defers to police authority, or 3) gets locked up. Mr. Gates couldn't do the first option, he refused to do the second, so he virtually begged for number three. It was certainly wrong, in this situation, to arrest Mr. Gates. But can it ever be right to cuff somebody for "contempt of cop"? The short answer is: yes.
In Amsterdam, the red-light district is the oldest and most notorious neighborhood. Two picturesque canals frame countless small pedestrian alleyways lined with legal prostitutes, bars, porn stores and coffee shops. In 2008, I visited the local police station and asked about the neighborhood's problems. I laughed when I heard that dealers of fake drugs were the biggest police issue -- but it's true.
Take the Violence Out of the Drug Trade
Baltimore Sun, August 3, 2004.
The only way to disarm the drug culture is to take the profit
out of street-level drug-dealing. Drug legalization and
regulation are the answer. Why leave the profits to those
who perpetuate violent culture?
Legalizing drugs would not be a silver bullet. But drug
prohibition must be recognized as a good intention gone
terribly wrong. The war on drugs destroys neighborhoods,
enriches drug dealers and promotes a culture ruining the
lives of our cities’ youths. Drug prohibition is a failure. It’s
time to try something else.
Feet on the Street
New York Post, June 23, 2003
Why does it take six calls and 90 minutes for police to “handle” a call for drinking and disorderly people on a slow
Sunday morning? Because police are out of touch with the
areas they are meant to serve. There’s no cops walking the
beat.
The difference between a group of people quietly hanging
out and the same group of people being disorderly or even
threatening is too subtle for a police officer to determine if
isolated in a squad car. Yet any pedestrian or foot officer
can immediately tell when something is amiss.
Old-School Cops in a New-School World
The Washington Post, August 5, 2003
One school of thought -- call it old school -- believes in the
moral righteousness of hitting back. Phrases like “he got what
he deserved” and “you reap what you sow” come to mind. If
someone disrespects you and grabs your private parts? The
old school says legal niceties be damned.
New-school police believe in cuffing suspects and writing
solid reports.
Though we demand new school behavior from our police,
most police officers are firmly old school. Old-school police
believe that the disrespectful deserve a “good thumping.” It’s
about respect.
Buckle-Up or the Lock-Up
The Baltimore Sun, April 27, 2001
Allowing police to jail people for non-jailable offenses is
absurd as it helps neither the public nor the police.
As for the police thanking the Supreme Court for our new
power, not from this cop.
Sergeants, lieutenants, captains and inspectors feel intense pressure to produce ever better stats. To some extent this can be good. Police are paid to work. But the pressure to produce more with less is as overwhelming as it is unrealistic. Mind you, the orders never come from above to just make numbers up, but when commanding officers talk about “productivity,” the rank-and-file hear “quotas.”
Karen Schmeer’s death is more than a simple tragedy. Karen wasn’t just in the wrong place at the wrong time. Karen might be alive if police did not bend or break the exact rules put in place to prevent this kind of senseless death.
The NYPD pursuit policy is based on the only effective way to reduce the danger of a car chase: don’t do it. For police, it's as simple as it is unsatisfying.
Book Reviews
Breaking Rank: A Top Cop’s Exposé of the Dark Side of Policing by Norm Stamper
Law Enforcement News, September, 2005
Pity poor Norm Stamper. He would have liked nothing more
than to write a book extolling the virtues of community policing
and a greater police focus on domestic violence. A hard-working liberal police officer for 33 years, he rose from San
Diego beat cop to chief of the Seattle Police Department.
Then came the 1999 WTO meeting in Seattle. Massive
protests and riots turned the city into chaos. Chief Stamper
later resigned, admitting that he and his police were woefully
unprepared for the scale of protests. Stamper’s name is now
cursed by both ends of the political spectrum, albeit for
different and often diametrically opposed reasons.
The Thin Black Line: True Stories by Black Law Enforcement Officers Policing America's Meanest Streets by Hugh Holton
Washington Post, January 11, 2008
The stories police officers tell each other often don't amuse outsiders. While fellow cops laugh, an outsider is left thinking, "Is it funny that a man bleeds to death?" or "You took crutches away from a one-legged homeless man?" But police don't tell these stories to entertain outsiders. A story is more than a way to bond over a beer after work; it's an essential tool of the trade.
Before I was a police officer, I loved the TV show "COPS." But after a few nights in a police car, I realized that "COPS" wasn't the real deal. The dialogue was stilted, on guard, seemingly self-censored for the more politically correct masses. The Thin Black Line, a collection of 28 oral histories of black law enforcement officers in U.S. cities from coast to coast, is similarly restrained. I'm certain these officers have great stories to tell. They just don't tell them here.
Against Prediction: Profiling, Policing, and Punishing in an Actuarial Age by Bernard Harcourt
American Journal of Sociology. 2008. Vol. 113(5).
Under the medieval system of tything, individuals could be held responsible for the misdeeds of others in their collective group. In the movie Minority Report, set in the near future, criminals are incarcerated before they commit their crimes. Our present system of justice, according to Bernard E. Harcourt’s Against Prediction, combines the worst of both worlds. “The quest for prediction,” Harcourt writes, “has distorted our conception of just policing by emphasizing efficiency over crime minimization. Profiling has become second nature because of our natural tendency to favor economic efficiency.”